When Vulnerability Goes Too Far

We live in an age of exposure. Today people post every thought, feeling, and experience. People are interviewed publicly about the details of their love and marriage, about their parenting, their courtship, their private struggles, and the most intimate details of their lives. Nothing is sacred. Nothing is holy. Nothing is Holy of Holies. There is nothing left that belongs to just them.

Every thought is shared. Every emotion is posted. Every experience is documented, recorded, uploaded, and broadcast. Dating, marriage, parenting, hardship, triumph,  all of it becomes content and for those competing in a world in which content is king, nothing is more tempting than oversharing.

Of course, there is value in vulnerability. Other people can learn from our experiences. Sharing can be mechazek, it can strengthen others. It can reduce stigma. It can create connection. I understand that.

Our parsha, Terumah, introduces us to the layout and floor plan of the Mishkan, the holy Tabernacle. The outer courtyard hosted the altar where sacrifices were offered. The Kodesh, or the holy section, housed the menorah and the shulchan. The last section was the Kodesh HaKodashim, the Holy of Holies that housed the Aron and was only entered by the Kohen Gadol on Yom Kippur. Our sacred ark which held our sacred luchos and the original Torah scroll was in the most private and inaccessible part of the Mishkan.

Rabbi Soloveitchik suggested that we model our personal lives after the structure and layout of the Mishkan:

From the time I was young, I learned to restrain my feelings and not to demonstrate what was happening in my emotional world. My father would say that the holier and more intimate the feeling, the more it should be concealed. There is a hidden curtain that separates between one’s interior and the exterior: “and the dividing curtain shall separate for you between the Holy and the Holy of Holies.” What location is more sanctified than the inner sanctum of one’s emotional life?

The Holy of Holies was separated by a paroches, a curtain. Not everything was meant for public view. Not everything was meant to be entered freely. If we live in a world where there is no emotional Holy of Holies, where everything is secular, profane, and publicly shared, then what is left of our lives? What remains intimate? What remains our sacred space?

If every conversation you have with God is also one you are willing to have into a microphone and camera, is there any true intimacy between you and Hashem? If every conversation you have with your spouse is one you would comfortably share publicly, is there emotional intimacy between the two of you? If every feeling and thought you would once have shared only with your closest friend is now something you post online, then what remains behind the curtain? Without a curtain, there is no Holy of Holies. And without a Holy of Holies, there is no intimacy.

This concern is not only spiritual. It is psychological and relational. Research increasingly shows that while moderate vulnerability builds connection, habitual oversharing can erode emotional intimacy. Studies suggest that more than sixty percent of adults report difficulty with emotional intimacy in close relationships, often citing fear of vulnerability and blurred personal boundaries as contributing factors. Surveys from the American Psychological Association indicate that heavy social media users are significantly more likely to report feelings of loneliness and superficial connection despite frequent sharing. A recent report from the Pew Research Center found that nearly half of adults say social media makes it harder to maintain meaningful boundaries in relationships. Relationship therapists consistently observe that couples who regularly process private marital conflict publicly, whether online or broadly within social circles, experience lower long-term trust and diminished emotional safety.

Why does this happen? Because intimacy requires containment. True emotional intimacy is not merely disclosure. It is selective disclosure within a protected space. When everything is shared, nothing feels chosen. Nothing feels exclusive. Nothing feels sacred. Oversharing can create what psychologists describe as pseudo intimacy, the illusion of closeness without the depth that comes from protected vulnerability. When every emotion is externalized to an audience, it is no longer held carefully within a relationship. And intimacy thrives on what is held.

We are in danger of becoming a generation without a paroches. A generation where nothing is reserved, where no conversation is too sacred to record, where no struggle is too private to publish. But holiness depends on separation. The Torah’s entire system of kedusha is built on havdala, on distinction, between kodesh and chol, between public and private, between outer courtyard and inner sanctuary. If there is no emotional curtain, there is no emotional sanctuary. If there is no sanctuary, there is no sacred space for marriage. If there is no sacred space for marriage, there is no deep trust. If there is no sacred space with God, then tefillah risks becoming performance rather than encounter.

Let me be clear. This is not a criticism of any individual. There is real value in appropriate sharing. There are times when speaking openly helps others. There are times when sharing pain reduces isolation. There are times when telling our story gives someone else strength. But the question is not whether to share. The question is what we hold back, what we preserve, what we protect.

Every relationship needs something that belongs only to it. A marriage needs conversations that exist nowhere else. A soul needs prayers that are never recorded. A family needs memories that are never posted. We must restore the paroches. We must recreate that section of our lives that is not for public consumption. We must consciously designate an emotional Holy of Holies. Because intimacy requires exclusivity. Holiness requires boundaries. And connection, whether with a spouse or with Hashem, requires something that is just between us.

If everything is shared, nothing is sacred. Let us bring back the curtain.

Why There is No “Someone Else”

Over the past decade, something subtle but profoundly consequential has shifted in our collective mindset. There was a time when “free” felt like a gift: unexpected, generous, and almost miraculous. But slowly, and without notice, “free” stopped feeling like a blessing and started feeling like a baseline expectation. What once inspired gratitude now often triggers entitlement. This shift is not only cultural or economic. It is deeply spiritual.

 

We have become accustomed to receiving extraordinary value instantly and effortlessly. With a tap or a swipe, we learn, watch, listen, scroll, and download. But rarely do we pause to consider the cost behind what appears to be free. The writers, the educators, the engineers, and the infrastructure, representing the countless hours poured in by people we will never meet, all fade into the background, hidden behind the screen.

 

Of course, free never means costless. It simply means that someone else is paying. Sometimes we pay with our data or attention. Sometimes we pay with privacy. But often, the true cost is carried quietly by others in their time, resources, emotional energy, or burnout. The more we grow accustomed to receiving without contributing, the more something within us subtly dulls. Responsibility loosens, expectations inflate, and the mindset that develops online inevitably spills into our real lives, into our communities, our relationships, and even our relationship with Torah itself.

 

Judaism teaches that gratitude is not merely a feeling or a polite thank you. It is a posture. It is action. It is participation. The very word “Yehudi” comes from hoda’ah, meaning acknowledgment or admission. To be a Jew is to recognize that we are not self-made. We depend on Hashem and we depend on one another, and that dependence demands a response.

 

If someone examined your credit card statement, what story would it tell? What would they conclude truly matters to you? Our spending is not random. It reflects our comforts, our habits, and our priorities. But does it reflect our values, our spiritual aspirations, or our commitment to community?

 

We spend, often unthinkingly, on convenience, entertainment, and endless upgrades. Yet when it comes to Torah institutions, communal life, and spiritual growth, we sometimes hesitate. Not because these things do not matter to us, but because we have grown used to receiving without being asked. So when a website pops up with a request to support the Torah content we enjoy daily, we click away and continue receiving the benefit while assuming someone else will contribute.

 

That is why Parshas Shekalim speaks so powerfully to our moment. Every Jew over twenty was required to give a machatzis hashekel, a half shekel, to fund the communal offerings in the Beis HaMikdash. It was not a voluntary contribution, nor was it tiered by income. The Torah makes a point of saying that the rich shall not give more and the poor shall not give less. Why not let the wealthy shoulder the full cost? Why obligate the poor at all?

 

Because community is not built by spectators. It is built by stakeholders. The Torah insists that every Jew, no matter their means, must have a share, a portion, and a stake in sustaining our sacred life together. No one is meant to be a passive consumer of Jewish life. We are meant to be partners in building it.

 

The half shekel teaches that belonging requires contribution. It is not enough to care. One must commit. It is not enough to appreciate. One must participate. The instinct to assume that someone else will take care of it is not new. We tell ourselves someone else will donate, someone else will volunteer, or someone else will lead. But the Torah responds with a gentle but firm truth: there is no someone else. There is only us.

 

In our digital age, it is easier than ever to opt out. No one sees if you close the appeal. No one knows if you scroll past the fundraiser. But Torah is not about what others see. It is about who we become. Gratitude is not the debt we owe to make the giver whole. It is the gift we give to make ourselves whole, an expression of humility, of acknowledgment, and of recognizing that our lives have been enriched by others.

 

When we contribute, even modestly and even privately, we undergo a subtle yet profound transformation. We shift from passive recipients to active partners, from consumers to builders, and from takers to sustainers. The question is not whether everything must be monetized. Of course not. The explosion of accessible Torah is an enormous beracha. The question is whether the culture of free has eroded our instinct to give back.

 

So we must ask ourselves—when something uplifts you, inspires you, strengthens your emunah, or deepens your learning, do you see yourself as a consumer or as a partner? Even a small contribution matters. Not only because of what it enables, but because of what it says about our investment and our place in the community.

 

The Beis HaMikdash was sustained not by a handful of magnanimous donors, but by a nation of half shekel partners. Free can be kind, but gratitude must be intentional. Before assuming that free means no cost, pause and ask who made this possible and how you can help sustain it. Reflect on what you consume and equally on what you contribute. Cultivate the habit of noticing the effort behind the inspiration.

 

With that in mind, I want to share that our annual BRS Global Campaign is now underway. Every shiur you listen to, every class you watch, every article you read, and every moment of Torah that strengthens your soul is made possible only through the partnership of those who believe in spreading Torah to every corner of the world.

 

If BRS Torah has enriched your life in any way, if it has helped you grow, inspired you, challenged you, or brought you closer to Hashem, I ask you to consider expressing that gratitude in a tangible way. Our ability to continue teaching, sharing, and uplifting depends on those who benefit stepping forward to sustain this sacred work. If you have not yet participated, please take a moment today to join us as a partner by visiting brsonline.org/global and making your contribution. Your gift declares that this matters, that you are part of this, and that you are counted in.

 

A Full-Page Ad and a Photo Op: Is Ye’s Apology Enough?

This week, Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, took out a full page advertisement in The Wall Street Journal titled, “To Those I’ve Hurt.” In it, he addressed years of publicly documented antisemitic remarks and behavior, admitted that his untreated bipolar type 1 disorder following an earlier brain injury contributed to a period in which he lost touch with reality and made deeply harmful statements, and expressed remorse, claimed commitment to accountability and change, and insisted that he is not antisemitic.

 

Our tradition most certainly believes in the possibility of repentance and repair.  But Teshuva, return, is not merely saying or publishing, “I am sorry.” It is a rigorous and demanding moral process that asks us to confront the damage we caused, accept responsibility, and change our behavior so that the harm is not repeated. What separates a meaningful apology from an empty one is not eloquence, but evidence.

 

A true apology begins with responsibility without qualification. It must say, “I did this and it was wrong.” It centers the experience of those harmed rather than the internal struggles of the one who caused the harm. In Ye’s letter he frames his conduct through the lens of untreated illness, claiming that his judgment was impaired. Mental illness is real and deserves compassion. But explanation is not the same as accountability. Jewish ethics insists that even when there are contributing factors, the pain inflicted on others must remain at the center of the apology. The harmed are not required to accept context before they are acknowledged.

 

Our tradition also teaches that, importantly, an apology is not a single moment but rather the beginning of a process. Repair often requires repetition, humility, and patience. These factors matter because this is not Ye’s first apology. There have been previous expressions of regret, including public statements and gestures toward the Jewish community. Yet those apologies were followed by further statements and actions that reopened wounds and reinforced distrust.

 

Judaism is clear on this point. Teshuva is measured not by how convincingly one apologizes but by whether one acts differently when given the chance.

 

Words without behavioral change remain words. The Talmud teaches that repentance must be manifested in deeds. In personal relationships, an apology that is not accompanied by change lacks credibility. The same is true on a communal and global stage. When harm has been broadcast to millions, repair must also be visible, sustained, and proportional.

 

There is also a deeper moral challenge that must be confronted. In his bestselling book “The Sunflower,” Simon Wiesenthal recounts his work camp experience of being brought to a dying Nazi soldier’s bedside. The man turned to Wiesenthal and confessed his crimes and horrific wrongdoings against the Jewish people. He then asked Wiesenthal to serve as a representative of all his victims and begged forgiveness. Wiesenthal describes that he could not grant the soldier his wish because some things are simply too heinous and atrocious to forgive. Wiesenthal describes that the rest of his life, he remained tortured by that request and by his reaction to it.

When harm is inflicted upon an entire people, forgiveness is no longer a private exchange. It becomes a collective moral dilemma.

 

Ye is not a Nazi soldier, but his hateful words do not exist in a vacuum. His comments, tweets, interviews and music reach millions. His past comments amplified antisemitic tropes, normalized conspiracy theories, and emboldened those already inclined toward hate. That level of harm cannot be undone with a single full-page advertisement, no matter how prominent the platform or how carefully chosen the language. Exposure on that scale leaves scars that linger long after the apology fades from public view.

 

Repentance and forgiveness are not achieved through optics. A photo op with a celebrity rabbi is not evidence of remorse, just as a full page advertisement is not proof of transformation. Forgiveness cannot be purchased with access, visibility, or carefully staged gestures. It must be earned slowly through sincerity, consistency, and humility. Teshuva does not happen in a moment and it is not secured through symbolism alone. The longer the hate was expressed and the deeper the damage inflicted, the more time is required and the greater the demonstration of change must be evidenced before trust can begin to return.

 

Performative gestures may create headlines, but they do not heal communities. When repentance is reduced to an image or a moment it risks becoming transactional rather than transformational.  What matters is not who one stands next to for a photograph but what one stands for consistently when the cameras are gone.

 

This moment has produced divided responses within the Jewish community. Some have responded with gratitude, embracing Ye’s apology and implicitly presenting themselves as speaking on behalf of the entire Jewish people in granting acceptance and forgiveness. Others have moved just as quickly in the opposite direction dismissing the apology outright or labeling it opportunistic, insincere, or fraudulent. But perhaps both reactions arrive too early.

 

There is no single Jewish voice authorized to accept or reject repentance on behalf of all Jews, especially when the harm was global and the wounds unevenly distributed. Forgiveness in such cases cannot be rushed nor can it be crowdsourced in the immediate aftermath of a public statement.

 

Our sages taught kabdeihu v’chashdeihu, treat a person with generosity while also exercising caution. Judaism allows for optimism without naivety and hope without surrendering discernment. We can acknowledge the possibility of sincerity while remaining appropriately skeptical, especially when the harm was extensive, repeated, and amplified over time.

 

This is why teshuva demands more than statements of intent. Rather than telling us what he plans to do next, the more meaningful path forward is simply to do it. Let Ye use his influence to advocate consistently and publicly for the Jewish people and for the Jewish state. Speak out forcefully against antisemitism wherever it appears, especially when it comes from allies or audiences that are harder to challenge. Withdraw songs and delete content that spews hate no matter how popular they have become or how inconvenient to eliminate.  Support education that exposes the lies of hatred and teaches the real human cost of antisemitism. Stand alongside those targeted, not once, but repeatedly, visibly, and without qualification.

 

Teshuva is not performed in headlines. It is lived through sustained action over time. Ye himself asks for patience and understanding as he seeks his way forward. Judaism recognizes that transformation takes time and when repentance is genuine we are commanded to welcome it. But welcome does not require naivete. Caution is not cynicism. It is wisdom shaped by experience.

 

If Ye’s apology is sincere it will be proven not by another letter but by a consistent pattern of behavior that repairs rather than retraumatizes. The longer the hate persisted and the deeper the damage inflicted the longer the road back must be and the clearer the evidence of change needs to be.

 

Only through time action and demonstrated transformation can the question Wiesenthal posed begin to find its answer. Until then words alone are not enough.

The Cost of Being First

While returning to school from a class trip, a third-grade student from Yeshivat Noam in Paramus was severely injured when a rock was thrown at her school bus on the New Jersey Turnpike. As the buses traveled near the Teaneck Road exit, a large rock shattered a window and struck the young girl in the head. What initially appeared to be a minor injury quickly turned into a nightmare. A CAT scan revealed bleeding on the brain and the child now required surgery. Baruch Hashem the surgery was successful and she is recovering.

 

It was frightening. It was horrifying. And it understandably shook our community to its core.

 

Almost immediately, social media erupted. Though the school and law enforcement explicitly stated that they did not yet know the nature or motive of the incident (and there were no external markings on the bus that identified it as a bus with Jewish students), many online rushed to label it a horrific antisemitic attack. Predictably, the declarations followed. This is the end of Jewish life in America. Jews are no longer safe. History is repeating itself before our eyes.

 

Two days later, an arrest was made.

 

Authorities announced that the suspect, already charged in a series of rock-throwing incidents across Bergen County, was not motivated by antisemitism. He was mentally unstable. State police revealed that he had been awaiting trial for similar acts, including an aggravated assault in Bogota that had already landed him in jail. Court records showed multiple additional charges after his release, including alleged assaults on law enforcement officers, criminal mischief, and trespassing.

 

This was not a hate crime. It was a tragic act of violence committed by someone deeply unwell.

 

Just a few months earlier, a remarkably similar story unfolded. In October, a rabbi in New Jersey was attacked outside his home. Surveillance footage showed bystanders rushing to help as the rabbi and a good Samaritan suffered minor injuries. Within minutes, the internet declared with certainty that a rabbi putting up his sukkah was attacked in broad daylight by an antisemite.

 

Strong statements followed. Dire warnings were issued. Fear spread.

 

But once again, the facts told a different story. Police stated clearly, “This was a random act of violence. No words were exchanged prior to the assault, and there is no indication that this attack was motivated by race, religion, or ethnicity.” The suspect had a criminal record. There was no evidence of a hate crime. The rabbi was not putting up his sukkah. And yet the online verdict had already been rendered.

 

I do not share these stories to minimize or dismiss the very real and deeply disturbing rise in antisemitism. The statistics are undeniable. The threats are real. The actual, horrific acts of violence that have occurred are too painful and numerous to count. We must remain vigilant, courageous, and vocal. We must call out hatred, confront it, and fight it legally, morally, and spiritually.

 

The rush to assume motive is understandable. After October 7th (and the response to it), comedian Jim Gaffigan captured a feeling many Jews recognized when he quipped, “Does anyone else feel the need to call all their Jewish friends and say, ‘Okay, you weren’t being paranoid’?”

 

And yet, Torah does not ask us only to feel. It asks us to think. To pause. To reflect.

Our rabbis begin Pirkei Avos with the teaching: hevei mesunim b’din, be slow to judgment. Rabbeinu Yonah explains that one who is quick to judge is called a sinner. Even if he believes he is speaking truth, his error is not considered accidental. It is closer to willful wrongdoing, because he failed to reflect. A hasty mind, Rabbeinu Yonah teaches, lacks the depth required to truly know.

 

Technology has reshaped how we process reality. Information travels instantly. Opinions spread faster than facts. There is a cultural race to be first, to alert, to alarm, to analyze, to advise, often without the patience to gather, to listen, to learn. This is dangerous for the content creator and the content consumer alike. And despite repeated examples, we seem unwilling to slow down.

 

We are watching this same phenomenon play out now as the public rushes to conclusions about the incident involving the death of Renee Nicole Good at the hands of an ICE agent in Minneapolis. Before full video evidence emerged, before facts were established, before investigations concluded (or were even conducted!), each side hurried to condemn or defend, to accuse or absolve, filtered entirely through preconceived narratives. We saw not events, but reflections of our own assumptions.

 

Hevei mesunim b’din.

 

This teaching is not about passivity. It is about discipline. It is not a call to ignore injustice, but a demand to pursue truth responsibly. A Torah-guided life insists that moral clarity must be built on factual clarity. Outrage untethered from truth does not heal the world. It fractures it further.

 

The Torah’s insistence on deliberation is not antiquated wisdom. It is desperately needed guidance for a hyperconnected, emotionally charged age. Being slow to judgment does not make us naive. It makes us trustworthy. It makes our voices credible when real hatred appears, when genuine threats emerge, when antisemitism unmistakably reveals itself.

 

If we cry wolf every time, if we speak with certainty before we know, then when the wolf truly comes, our warnings lose their force.

 

We owe it to the victims of real hate. We owe it to our community. And we owe it to the Torah that demands integrity not only in what we believe, but in how we arrive there.

 

Hevei mesunim b’din. In a world rushing to conclusions, have the courage to pause.

 

When Football Meets Faith: Does God Really Care Who Wins?

On Sunday night in Pittsburgh, the Baltimore Ravens and Pittsburgh Steelers’ seasons came down to one kick. Tyler Loop, the Ravens’ rookie kicker who had not missed a single field goal under 50 yards all year, lined up for a 44-yard attempt that would decide the game and, by extension, the winner of the AFC North. The snap was perfect, the hold was clean, the ball had the distance. And then, before a stunned stadium and a national audience, it drifted wide. The Steelers won and are going to the playoffs, while Baltimore’s season ended abruptly and stunningly.

 

The moment went viral not only because of the drama, but because earlier that evening a priest had walked the field and sprinkled “holy water” in one of the end zones. Hours later, it was that very end zone toward which the Ravens were kicking. Asked about it after the game, Steelers captain Cam Heyward smiled and said he wouldn’t ask too many questions but said, “The good Lord made a good decision that night.”

 

I don’t follow football and didn’t even know about the game until someone sent me the article about the “blessed” end zone and asked the real question behind the headline: Are Jews really meant to believe Hashem intervenes in a football game?

 

But this isn’t a sports question. It’s a life question. Is anything too small for Hashem? Is a moment, a decision, a gust of wind beneath His notice or providence?

 

Though there is nuance, and there are different approaches, the short answer is that as Torah people of faith, we are meant to live with the belief that Hashem is involved in everything. Dovid HaMelech wrote (and we sing in Hallel), ha’mashpili lir’os ba’shomayim u’vaaretz, He lowers Himself to see in the heavens and on the earth. Chazal understand that nothing is too lofty for Him and nothing is too small. The same God Who guides the fate of nations is attentive to the details of a single life. The same God Who orchestrates history also arranges the gust of wind that pushes a football a degree to the right. There is no realm of existence in which He is absent, no moment in which He is not present.

 

So does Hashem care who wins? In the sense that He is involved in and dictates everything that unfolds in His world, yes. But not in the simplistic way we imagine. Hashem was not only listening to the tefillos of Steelers fans. He was also speaking to the Ravens, to their coaches, and especially to the young kicker who missed for the first time from that distance. God was present not only in the celebration, but in the heartbreak.

 

We control our effort. Hashem controls the result. That is countercultural, but it is Torah. From our perspective, a capable kicker missed in a pressure moment. From the perspective of emunah, Hashem decreed that at that exact second, in those exact conditions, the ball would not pass through the uprights. For one side, that miss felt like a divine yes. For the other, a painful no. Yet both were within His plan.

 

Judaism insists that Hashem is as present in the miss as in the make. In the disappointment as in the triumph. The question this game invites is not whether God was in the stadium, it is whether we are listening to what He might be telling us through the moment.

 

Failure does not have to be a verdict. It can be an invitation. A chance to grow, to soften, to deepen. Sometimes Hashem uses a public disappointment to remind a person that he is more than his statistics.

 

This truth is beautifully symbolized in a custom many barely meaningfully think about or attach spiritual significance to. At a Bar Mitzvah or an Aufruf we throw candies at the boy or the chassan. As Rav Schorr explains, these are moments of transition and growth. Life will soon begin throwing things at them. They will feel struck, pelted. But the things being thrown are candies. They hurt, but inside is sweetness. Inside the challenge is a gift, if one has the courage to pick it up and unwrap it.

 

The missed kick in Pittsburgh is one of those candies. Most of us will never stand in a stadium with millions watching, but all of us stand in our own decisive moments: a diagnosis, an interview, a shidduch, an application. We prepare, we daven, we give our all. Then the answer comes. Sometimes it is the yes we prayed for. Sometimes it is the no we feared.

 

When it is yes, we must remember Who decided it. When it is no, we must remember the candy, the possibility of hidden sweetness.

 

The “holy water” on the field made for a good headline. But the deeper story is not about a priest or an AFC North title. It is about haMashpili lir’os baShamayim u’vaAretz, about a God Who lowers Himself to be present in every end zone and every human heart.

 

Because the real game is not played on the field at all. It is played inside the neshamah of each of us.

 

What Pushing In Your Chair Says About You

My children know one of my little pet peeves is not a big offence, not something worthy of public rebuke, but a small thing I see everywhere: when a person gets up from a table and does not push the chair back in. You see it in shul and a beis medrash, around the Shabbos table, in a boardroom or a restaurant. Just a chair left askew. It is easy to dismiss it as trivial, and yet it represents something more.

We often underestimate the power of small acts. Throughout shas, our rabbis refer to the head of the Jewish community as Reish Sidra, the head of order.  He attains that position specifically because he is attentive to the importance of small acts.  He knows that seder, order, is the scaffolding of a disciplined life.

In his Daas Torah, Rabbi Yerucham Levovitz zt”l writes about how the Alter of Kelm was famed for his rigorous emphasis on seder, mussar, and disciplined excellence.  He writes, “I was educated in Kelm, a place where they were extremely meticulous about order. The Alter of Kelm, of blessed memory, would become upset if someone did not put their chair back precisely in its place, as though they had committed an act equivalent to desecrating Shabbos.”

The Alter did not view order as an aesthetic. He saw it as a religious imperative. Put another way, chaos is spiritual drift and order is spiritual anchoring.

The Alter taught that seder is like the string in a pearl necklace. The pearls are what we treasure, the Torah, mitzvos, kindness, family, community. But without the string, the pearls scatter, beautiful yet valueless.   Rav Yeruchem inherited a garment the Alter wore for 30 years and it was taken care of so meticulously, it was left after his death as if it was brand new.  It was not because the Alter was particular for its own sake, but because care and respect for the world around him were reflections of inner order. When he put on his hat, it was not tilted to the right or left or sitting casually on the back of his head. It was perfectly aligned. This was not compulsive behavior. This was a deeply felt spiritual discipline.

And now, what Torah always knew, science is beginning to affirm. A recent study reports that people who push their chair in tend to exhibit what researchers call social mindfulness and self- control. These acts reflect awareness of others, consideration, discipline, and responsibility even when no one is watching.

The article explains that a person who pushes in their chair is:

• Attentive to their surroundings.

• Conscious of how their actions affect others.

• Habitually considerate, acting with kindness without needing to think about it.

• Naturally disciplined, showing care through consistent small behaviors.

• Respectful, recognizing shared spaces and the people who use them.

• Unselfish, leaving things better for the next person.

• Mindful, living with awareness rather than carelessness.

In other words, this tiny gesture reflects a broader pattern of character. The way a person treats a chair is often how they treat the world.

A simple pause before leaving a table, placing the chair neatly, says: I see the world as something sacred, worthy of care. It reveals a person who thinks not just about self but about others who will come after.

And here is the deeper lesson: discipline begets freedom. A person who masters small actions gains mastery over larger ones. When you manage your time with order, you find you have more time. When you manage money with discipline, you find you have more resources. When you bring seder to your Torah learning and mitzvah observance, you unlock deeper growth and fulfillment.

This is not about perfectionism. It is about intentionality. The discipline to sit down and learn consistently. The discipline to serve Hashem when it is hard. The discipline to be reliable and present for another human being.

This is why I often tell my children that when they begin to think about dating and building a life with someone, they should not only look at grand gestures, eloquent words, or impressive résumés. They should watch the small things. Does this person say thank you? Do they notice when someone is uncomfortable? Do they treat waiters, teachers, siblings, and strangers with quiet respect? And yes — do they push in their chair. Not because the chair matters, but because derech eretz matters. Because the way a person handles the unimportant is often the truest window into how they will handle what is important. A home is not built on dramatic moments alone; it is built on thousands of tiny acts of consideration, patience, and care. Choosing a life partner is ultimately choosing the character you want to live with, grow with, and be shaped by. And character is most honestly revealed not in what is proclaimed, but in what is practiced when no one is watching.

So the next time you rise from the table, do not rush out. Pause for just a second. Turn back. Push your chair in. Let that act be a microcosm of your life: careful, considerate, and connected to something greater than yourself.

 

 

The Sound of a Beer Bottle: A Twenty-Year Journey, One Day at a Time

Twenty years ago, a woman I knew came to me with a heavy heart. She was married to a man who had become an alcoholic. This wasn’t social drinking nor was it “a little too much at kiddush or at a simcha.” It was a pattern that was slowly hollowing out his life and his home. She was clear on what had to happen, but she lacked the courage and confidence to confront him. She asked me if I would.

As a young rabbi, I was inexperienced in this area (and most others) but I knew one thing: confrontation can humiliate or it can heal. It can push a person further into denial, or it can become the beginning of their redemption. I agreed to speak with this husband, not because I had guarantees about how it would go, but because looking away and staying silent was no longer an option.

I called him and asked if I could stop by. I didn’t spell out why, I just asked if we could catch up. I will never forget that evening: the fear I felt pulling up to his house, the tefillah I whispered asking Hashem to give me the right words. When I arrived, we sat outside. In his typical generous hospitality, he opened two beers, one for himself and one for me. On the surface, it was the picture of two people, friends shmoozing on a nice Florida evening. We spoke about work, family, life. It felt casual, unforced.

But the whole time, beneath the surface, I knew I wasn’t there just to catch up. I wasn’t there to judge him, label him, or attack him. I was there to share a truth that his wife, some close friends, and I all saw clearly, and that he, on some level, likely already knew but had not allowed himself to fully face. At a certain point, I gently steered the conversation where it needed to go.

“Look, I didn’t come here only to hang out. I came because your wife, some close friends, and I are very concerned. We see the role alcohol plays in your life, and it isn’t healthy; it has gotten out of control. This isn’t easy for me to say, but it’s harder to watch you continue this way and say nothing.” When you bring something like this up, you brace yourself for the response: “You’re overreacting. Everyone drinks. This is my business, not yours. Mind your own business. Stay out of my personal life.” You expect anger, denial, defensiveness.

This man didn’t do any of that. He didn’t blow up or storm off. Instead, he looked at me. Really looked at me. He gave me a long, strong, searching stare that made time feel like it had slowed down. It wasn’t a hateful look, and it wasn’t even particularly angry. It was the look of a man suddenly faced with a mirror he could no longer avoid. In that moment, it felt as if he was asking himself, “Is this really what people see when they look at me? Is he serious? Am I an alcoholic? Have I lost control?”

Then, without fanfare, without any dramatic declaration, he put his beer down and the sound of the glass made a clank. He did not take another sip. We continued to talk. From the outside, nothing dramatic had changed. There was no emotional explosion, no tearful promise, no big speech. But in that simple act of placing the beer down and not picking it back up, a line had been drawn. A decision had been made.

That beer was the last drink he ever took. From that day forward, he threw himself into recovery. He did not try to do it alone. He joined a recovery program. He went to meetings. He got a sponsor. He surrounded himself with people who understood his struggle and were committed to helping him heal and rebuild his life. And here is what is so remarkable: he told me that not only has he not touched alcohol since that day, but he has not even felt tempted to drink. Not once.

Twenty years ago, he put down that bottle and hasn’t picked up alcohol since, but that is far from the only change in his life. Twenty years of sobriety has meant twenty years of showing up differently for his family, for himself, for his career, and for Hashem. From the outside, it looks like he made one decision and held to it for two decades. But that is not how it really works. Recovery is not accomplished in twenty-year chunks. It can only ever be lived one day at a time.

When someone faces a destructive habit, whether alcohol, drugs, uncontrolled anger, dishonesty, impatience, or anything else, and realizes something must change, they often hear or tell themselves, “You can never do this again for the rest of your life. You have to stop forever.” The natural reaction is panic. “The rest of my life? Never again? That’s impossible. I’m guaranteed to fail.” The phrase “for the rest of your life” feels so big, so heavy, that it nearly paralyzes the person before they even take their first step.

We simply are not designed to live for “forever.” We are only capable of living today. But if instead you say, “Don’t drink today,” something shifts. Today is manageable. Today is concrete. Today feels attainable. Whatever we need to eliminate or work on, as soon as we move it into the realm of “forever,” it feels hopeless. But when we bring it down to one more day, to today, it becomes possible.

That is the secret of recovery: one day at a time. Not, “I will never drink again,” but, “Today, I will not drink. Today, I will stay sober.” And tomorrow, with Hashem’s help, we will say it again. You wake up in the morning and you don’t stay sober for twenty years; you stay sober for this morning, for this afternoon, for this evening. You do that enough times, and before you know it, those individual days have added up into something enormous. One day you turn around and realize that one more day and one more day and one more day without became twenty years.

When Yaakov Avinu agrees to work for Lavan for seven long, challenging years in order to marry Rochel, the Torah tells us something very surprising: “Vaya’avod Yaakov b’Rochel sheva shanim, vayihyu b’einav k’yamim achadim b’ahavaso osah.” Yaakov worked for Rochel for seven years, and they seemed to him but a few days, k’yamim achadim, because of his love for her.

At first glance, this is difficult to understand. When we long for something, when we are waiting for someone we love, time usually moves slowly. Every day feels like an eternity. When a chassan and kallah are waiting for their wedding, when someone is waiting for a refuah, when a person is waiting for vacation to start, it rarely feels like a “few days.” If anything, it feels like forever. So how could the Torah say that seven hard years passed for Yaakov “like a few days”?

Rabbi Dr. Abraham J. Twerski z”l, who was a world-renowned expert, thinker, and writer on addiction and recovery, suggests a beautiful insight. He points out that the word “achadim” shares a root with the word “echad,” one. Yaakov did not live those seven years as one overwhelming, crushing block of time. He lived them as yamim echadim, one day at a time. Each day was a single unit of avodah: one day of working, one day of being one step closer, one day of commitment, one day of holding on to his love for Rochel and his trust in Hashem. Seven years is daunting. “Today” is not. When one lives in the present day, focused on what today demands, seven years can indeed pass “like a few days.”

When my friend quietly put his beer down that day, I don’t believe he was consciously committing to perfection for the rest of his life or picturing celebrating his twentieth anniversary of sobriety. He was taking the next right step. He was agreeing to face the truth, to seek help, to walk into that first meeting, to say no to the immediate urge. He was choosing to live that day differently. Hashem took that one courageous “today” and, one day at a time, turned it into twenty years.

He and I met recently to sit and talk once again and to celebrate the twentieth anniversary of that fateful conversation.  He shared with me, “When I put the bottle of beer down, something happened.  Something humanly unexplainable.  A profound change happened instantly.  The only attribute could be Hashem.  He was the catalyst that began this journey.”   In recovery, step three is to submit to a higher power and trust in God for help.  Twenty years ago, my friend discovered a real and raw relationship with Hashem, a genuine and ongoing conversation with the Almighty.

As I marveled at his fortitude and accomplishment, I thought to myself: every one of us has something we need to work on, a temper that flares too quickly, a tongue that speaks too freely, a laziness that holds us back, a jealousy that corrodes our happiness, a private behavior we are ashamed of. When we tell ourselves, “I must never do this again for the rest of my life,” we set ourselves up to feel crushed and defeated. We mean well, but we are thinking in terms that only Hashem can handle.

What if, instead, we thought and spoke to ourselves the way Torah and recovery both teach us to: “Today, I will be careful with my speech. Today, I will work on being more patient. Today, I will not open that site, that bottle, that door. Today, I will show up as the husband, wife, parent, friend, Jew I know I can be.” The next day, we take a deep breath, trust in Hashem and say it again. Forever is not in our hands. Today is.

If you are like the woman in this story, watching someone you love slipping into something destructive, the feeling of helplessness can be overwhelming. You look at their future, and at yours, and “the rest of our lives” feels unbearably heavy. But you are not responsible to fix the rest of their life in one action, and you are not expected to know exactly what the next twenty years will bring. You can take one step. She took one step by reaching out and asking for help. I took one step by agreeing to have a hard conversation. He took one step by putting down that beer and walking into recovery. Each of those steps was a yom echad, a single day’s act of courage. Hashem can multiply that.

And if, in this story, you recognize yourself not in the wife but in the husband, if you sense that your drinking, or some other behavior, your private life, has become something you no longer fully control, then please hear this clearly: you do not need to promise perfection and you do not need to swear that you will never struggle again. You need to be honest today. Today, admit that this has gotten out of control. Today, share it with someone you trust. Today, make one phone call, walk into one meeting, send one message asking for help. Today, ask Hashem for the strength not for the next twenty years, but for the next twenty-four hours.

The yetzer hara, the voice of self-sabotage, loves the language of “forever.” It whispers, “You’ll never keep this up. You’ll fail eventually. Why even start if you can’t be perfect?” Torah and genuine recovery answer with the language of echad: not forever, but one. One step. One day. One honest conversation. One sincere tefillah. One refusal to pick up the next drink.

Twenty years ago, a wife’s fear, a husband’s hidden readiness, and one difficult but loving conversation converged on a porch. I can still hear the sound of him putting down that beer. That small, almost unremarkable motion did not just end a drink; it began a new life.

Published with permission

Falling Up: Winning through Failure

“What’s the Torah here?” What is the message?

 

A dear friend of mine often sees headlines or stories in the secular world and tries to seek deeper meaning behind them. In this case, he posted on his WhatsApp status a picture of a football player and the description of an unusual phenomenon.  The Denver Broncos are tied for the best record in the NFL but also leading the league in punts.  These data points seem contradictory because a team punts the ball when they fail to achieve a first down and concede being on offense to the other team.  Punting reflects failure and no team has punted this year more than the Broncos.  And yet, simultaneously, they are not only in first place in their division, they are tied for the best record in the game.  My friend posted these stats with the question, what is the Torah, what is the deeper message?

 

While I don’t follow football, this anomaly fascinated me, so I thought about it, took a shot, and wrote back, “Success isn’t linear.  Can’t do everything or score every play.  Need to punt when necessary in order to focus and win.”

 

As much as we wish life were simple, straightforward and linear, it is invariably filled with ups and downs, successes and failures, highs and lows.  Our instinct is to often fight this pattern, resist it, and resent it.  In truth, we should embrace the ride and work to move in the right direction.  

 

Rav Avraham Schorr explains that like an EKG, a straight, flat line means you are no longer alive.  Only when the line goes up and down, rising and falling, is the heart truly beating. The same is true of life: The ups and the downs, the moments of inspiration and the moments of struggle, are all signs that a person is spiritually alive and moving. Hashem designed the world so that growth happens through cycles, tests, successes, failures, rebuilding. A perfectly smooth life with no challenges might feel easier, but it would represent no movement, no pulse, no life.

 

Shlomo HaMelech teaches, “Sheva yipol tzaddik v’kam,” a righteous person falls seven times and rises. At first glance, it sounds like the tzaddik succeeds despite failure: he rises even though he falls. But Chazal reveal a deeper truth. The tzaddik does not rise in spite of the falls, he rises because of them. Each fall becomes part of the very process that shapes him.

 

The Chiddushei HaRim explains that a person gains from a fall what he could never gain from uninterrupted success. Falling teaches humility, reveals inner strength, refines character, and creates sensitivity toward the struggles of others. Every stumble forces a person to confront their limitations and renew their relationship with Hashem. In that sense, the fall is not an interruption to spiritual growth but the mechanism through which growth is achieved.

 

The pasuk does not say, “A person falls seven times, and a tzaddik rises.” It says, “Sheva yipol tzaddik v’kam.” The one who has fallen is already referred to as a tzaddik. Why? Because he kept getting up. His identity is defined not by the fall but by his response to it. The seven setbacks are not seven failures; they are the seven rungs of the ladder that lift him higher than untested success ever could.

 

Speaking at a Dartmouth graduation, Tennis great Roger Federer put it so well. He noted that in the 1,526 singles matches he played in his career, he won almost 80% of them. Then he asked the assembled crowd, “What percentage of the points do you think I won in those matches?” He paused. “Only 54 percent.” In other words, even top-ranked tennis players, the greatest who ever played the game, win barely more than half of the points they play. Federer continued:

 

When you lose every second point, on average, you learn not to dwell on every shot. You teach yourself to think: OK, I double-faulted. It’s only a point. OK, I came to the net and I got passed again. It’s only a point. Even a great shot … an overhead backhand smash that ends up on ESPN’s Top Ten Plays: that, too, is just a point.

 

Here’s why I am telling you this. When you’re playing a point, it is the most important thing in the world. But when it’s behind you, it’s behind you. This mindset … frees you to fully commit to the next point … and the next one after that … with intensity, clarity and focus.

 

The truth is, whatever game you play in life … sometimes you’re going to lose. A point, a match, a season, a job … it’s a roller coaster, with many ups and downs. And it’s natural, when you’re down, to doubt yourself. To feel sorry for yourself. And by the way, your opponents have self-doubt, too. Don’t ever forget that. But negative energy is wasted energy.

 

You want to become a master at overcoming hard moments. That to me is the sign of a champion. The best in the world are not the best because they win every point … It’s because they know they’ll lose … again and again … and have learned how to deal with it. You accept it. Cry it out if you need to … then force a smile. You move on. Be relentless. Adapt and grow. Work harder. Work smarter.

 

There is probably no athlete in history more associated with winning than Michael Jordan. Nike recognized his greatness early and became the largest apparel companies in the country by tying itself to Jordan’s talent and success. While most Nike commercials that featured Jordan would showcase his highlights and championships, a 1997 commercial shrewdly did the exact opposite. The brief commercial shows Jordan exiting a dimly lit arena as he narrates: “I’ve missed more than 9,000 shots in my career. I’ve lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times, I’ve been trusted to take the game-winning shot and missed. I’ve failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.”

 

In life, we often imagine spiritual growth as linear, smooth, steady, predictable. We think success means never punting, never losing a point. But the Torah teaches that a straight line is not the sign of life, it’s the sign of death. Movement, fluctuation, rise and fall, these are the signs of a beating heart. Our missteps and disappointments are not evidence that we are failing. They are invitations from Hashem to ascend higher. When we rise after falling, we emerge not as who we were before, but as someone deeper, wiser, and closer to Him.

 

So the next time you fall—and you will fall—remember: The 9-2, first-place Denver Broncos have punted more than any team in the league. Roger Federer lost 46% of his points. Michael Jordan lost hundreds of games. The tzaddik falls seven times. And the EKG only shows life when the line moves up and down.

 

Your falls don’t disqualify you from greatness. They are the very path to it. Don’t fear the fluctuations. Embrace them. They mean you are alive, growing, and on a real journey. They mean your heart is still beating.

 

 

 

This Anonymous Email Left Me Shaken

Just before Rosh Hashana an email arrived without a name: just a cry, an anonymous letter addressed not to me, but to God. “You have hurt me. You have abused and tortured me. You have taunted and judged me… You left me. And so I leave you, too.”  Line after line bled with anguish, betrayal, and the raw honesty of a broken heart.

 

This email didn’t just arrive in my inbox; it punched me in the gut.  I didn’t just read it with my eyes; I felt with my entire being the pain it conveyed.  At first glance, it smacks of heresy, sacrilege, and blasphemy.  “I leave you, too.” But when you read between the lines, you see something else altogether.  With permission, here is the email, followed by what I sent back as a response:

 

I write this to you, God, because the time for apologetics has come to an end. 

 

I will express this in no uncertain terms. You have hurt me. You have abused and tortured me. You have taunted and judged me. In my hour of need, you abandoned me. You have condemned me to loneliness and envy. You elect at every moment to continue to subject me to pain which drains the little hope I still have for things in my life to improve. I have been aware of all of this for awhile, but the time has come for me to say it. 

 

You dare call yourself a merciful father. A father who treats his children like you do deserves nothing but the staunchest condemnation. You willingly subject humanity to horrors unimaginable and claim to be a God of kindness and compassion. If you are as they say you are – omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent – then it is within your power to reverse the sadistic creation that you have fashioned. Yet you continuously choose to prop it up. Here is what I have to say to you. 

 

Nearly a decade of dedication to you. Your laws. What I thought was your will. Go on. I’d like you to think about the thousands of times I’ve prayed. Put on tefillin. Kept Shabbos. Pushed normal thoughts of girls out of my developing brain and castigated me when I strayed. I slaved away over a Gemara for years, bored to tears and pressured to meet toxic social standards, because I thought it would make you love me. Well, so be it. You have hurt me, and this time, I’m going to remember it. 

 

Of course, what I’d like to say is that I’m going to hurt you, too. But, if you are as they say you are, that’s not quite something I or anyone else can do. Fine. I accept that hurting you is beyond my control. Fortunately for me, you decided to grant me free will, and oh, I’m itching to use it. This mouth will never utter another word of praise or thanks to you, the source of my pain and misfortune. I will dedicate my arms and legs and ears to helping those in need because you have abandoned them, too. I will forever rue the day your cruel masochism decided to plant me in this traumatic world to suffer and scream. How many times – how many times?! – have I prayed to you to heal me? To comfort and console me? To show me the purpose in my pain? You have left me unanswered. You have stood me up. You left me. 

 

And so I leave you, too. 

 

May you know the pain of a parent witnessing their child turn his back and walk away. May you feel the seething grief that darkens my days and slashes at my guts. May your eyes flood with tears shed over losing your son forever. 

 

I don’t want you to explain anything anymore. I don’t want to hear from you at all. I’m done asking questions, and I’m done reaching out. I suppose the next time I see you will be whenever you decide to pluck me from this world and stand me up before your kangaroo court to judge me as a wicked man for defending myself from an abuser. Until then, please don’t talk to me. Don’t communicate with me. I will never forget what you have done to me, and I know you won’t, either. This Rosh Hashanah, I will be doing some remembering of my own. 

 

I hope it was worth it. 

 

My response:

 

I have read and re-read your email so many times and each time it breaks my heart and brings tears to my eyes.  I am beyond sorry for your pain and experiences.  I found your words so real, raw, authentic, and profound.  While they are written to “write off” Hashem, I see them as one of the greatest expressions of emunah I have ever read.  If you didn’t believe He is real you wouldn’t bother being angry or disappointed with Him or walking away from Him.  Your walking away is in fact an enormous demonstration of walking towards.  Maybe on Rosh Hashana, if you don’t want to open a machzor, print out your letter and read it to Him.  Scream it to Him.  

 

If you want to communicate further and if I can help you in any way, please let me know.  I am honored, humbled, and grateful that you shared your letter with me.  

 

The author ended up revealing himself to me and despite his letter of rejection to God, he not only attended Shul on Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur, he never stopped davening for a day. 

 

Although his letter rejected Hashem, the fact that he continued to seek Him reminded me of an image shared by Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel.

 

Elie Wiesel said that he was present when a group of inmates, suffering beyond comprehension in Auschwitz, put God on trial.  He described that the Almighty was found guilty for the evils of the Holocaust.  Wiesel later wrote a play on this topic called, “The Trial of God.”  What Wiesel said happened next is truly remarkable.  After the trial of God was over with a guilty verdict, noticing the sun was setting, the very same people who acted as the prosecutors organized a minyan and davened Mincha, the afternoon service.

 

I share this with you not as a model or standard for us to aspire to.  Anger at Hashem is not an ideal goal or objective, but it is also not a failure of faith or an expression of heresy.  There are some who go through all the motions of mitzvos and Torah, they daven diligently, they would say they talk to Hashem three times a day, but have they ever had a real and honest conversation with Him?

 

Associating what is happening in our lives as coming from our Creator is not heresy, it is faith.  Disappointment and malcontent are not necessarily indications of faithlessness, they are often evidence of genuine belief in God.  One is not angry at someone that isn’t real.  One doesn’t feel disappointed with a figment of their imagination. 

 

Indeed, while our greatest teachers and leaders were not ordinary people, and their words need to be studied, analyzed and appreciated for their deeper meaning, we do have precedent for directing dissatisfaction and challenges toward Hashem, beginning in our parsha with our founding father, Avraham. 

 

When informed that Sedom is going to be destroyed, Avraham doesn’t passively accept the will of Hashem.  He brazenly challenges: “Will You indeed sweep away the righteous with the wicked? … Shall not the Judge of all the earth do justice?”

 

Generations later, feeling overwhelmed and upset, even somewhat abandoned, Moshe challenges: “Why have You dealt ill with Your servant? … Did I conceive all this people? … I am not able to carry all this people alone… if You will deal thus with me, kill me, I pray You, at once.”

 

This theme continues with our Neviim. After Hashem spares the people of Nineveh, Yonah, feeling his mission is undermined, is explicitly angry: “But it displeased Yonah exceedingly, and he was angry. And he prayed and said, ‘Hashem, is not this what I said when I was yet in my country? … Therefore now, Hashem, please take my life from me.’” Experiencing misery, pain and grief, Iyov expresses his anger after what he feels is unjust suffering: “I will say to Hashem, Do not condemn me; show me why You contend with me.” Feeling betrayed, Yirmiyahu challenges: “You deceived me, Hashem and I was deceived; You overpowered me and prevailed. I am ridiculed all day long; everyone mocks me.”

 

To be clear, our great leaders used these moments to draw close, not to push away.  They believed in and were devoted to Hashem beyond anything we can understand.  Their words deserve to be studied closely. But it is undeniable that the Torah communicates their words in a way that gives us license to confront and protest to Hashem.  After all, that is the basis of all tefillah, an invitation to challenge the status quo and to appeal to the Almighty to do things differently.  

 

Don’t aspire to be upset at Hashem.  But if that is how you are feeling, don’t deny it, don’t beat yourself up, knock yourself down, or feel guilt and shame.  It’s okay to feel anger, disappointment, or betrayal toward Hashem. These emotions don’t have to distance us, they can draw us closer, deepen our prayers, and reveal the raw honesty of our faith. Like the letter-writer, we can confront God and yet continue to daven, knowing that our questions and our tears are themselves an expression of emunah

One More Conversation with Rabbi Hauer z”l

Coming off a joyous Simchas Torah, the excitement of the Yom Tov heightened with gratitude for the return of the twenty living hostages, I turned on my phone after Havdalah, eager to see more pictures of reunions and read stories of courage and resilience. And then, like so many others, I was stunned: my dear friend and mentor, Rabbi Moshe Hauer z”l, had suddenly passed away. It didn’t make sense. I couldn’t process it.

 

In the days since he was so abruptly taken from us, one thought has played over and over in my mind. If I had known that he would no longer be here on Motzei Yom Tov, I would have called him on Erev Yom Tov. I would have finished our conversations, told him what he meant to me, thanked him for all I had learned from him, and sought his guidance on how to continue the work he began.

 

I first met Rabbi Hauer many years ago, at a gathering organized by a mutual friend who brought together people he felt should know one another. There was no particular agenda, it wasn’t hosted by any organization, and it was such a success that for years, our group met annually to share, be vulnerable, brainstorm, collaborate, and inspire one another. 

 

At the first gathering, we were strangers: guarded, cautious, and formal with one another.  Rabbi Hauer sensed a need to break the ice and I vividly remember when he said, “Let’s get comfortable, let’s be real.  Enough with formalities. I am Moshe, not Rabbi Hauer,” and he proceeded to take his tie off, something I wasn’t under the impression he did often. At each gathering, his presence and participation contributed enormously.  With great humility and impeccable middos, he didn’t speak the most, and certainly not the loudest, but when he spoke he was a fountain of wisdom, thoughtfulness, insight.  He was sensitive, complimentary, authentic, genuine, and driven. 

 

What impressed me most over the years was that Rabbi Hauer was a true Ben Torah in every sense. As he built his shul and guided his community, he never left the Beis Midrash, never closed the Gemara. He remained growth-oriented, always striving, always climbing higher, and always inviting us to climb alongside him. Every conversation he had, every initiative he supported, was framed by a deep care for Klal Yisrael, for the community at large, and for each individual within it.

 

He was rare: proud and unapologetic about his hashkafa, his rebbeim, his principles, and his values, yet effortlessly and seamlessly connected with people of all backgrounds. He found common ground and common cause with everyone, and saw the Godliness in each person, developing genuine bonds while always remaining true to himself.

 

It is telling that in the days since his passing, tributes have come from a staggering variety of sources, including politicians and “plain” people, organizations like the OU and Agudah, the ADL, yeshivas and rabbis across denominations, and even the Catholic Bishops of New York. Rabbi Hauer’s reach was profound because his relationships were real, never performative, transactional, or forced.

 

Professionally, he shaped my rabbinate in countless ways, in ideas and practices I emulate, in how I see myself and my responsibility, in how I dream for Klal Yisrael. He stood with me when I needed support, spoke honestly when I needed feedback, and always did so with love. Personally, his loss is devastating. I find myself replaying voice notes he sent, each beginning with the affectionate, “Yedidi Rav Efrem.” In one, he said, “This message will have four points: Firstly, I haven’t spoken to you in ages, which I don’t like. Secondly, thank you for all you do,” before moving on to practical matters.

 

Here is the thing.  I know I am far from the only one.  Rabbi Hauer had this warm, affectionate, complimentary, close connection with countless shul members, talmidim, colleagues, friends, and community leaders.  His love for us was real, it was genuine, and it nourished our souls and warmed our hearts.

 

When he became the Executive Vice President of the OU, a leader and spokesperson for Klal Yisrael, his title and sense of mission changed but his character and personal conduct remained the same. 

 

When the Torah describes how Moshe and Aharon went to confront Pharaoh it says (Shemos 6:27):

הֵ֗ם הַֽמְדַבְּרִים֙ אֶל־פַּרְעֹ֣ה מֶֽלֶךְ־מִצְרַ֔יִם לְהוֹצִ֥יא אֶת־בְּנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל מִמִּצְרָ֑יִם ה֥וּא מֹשֶׁ֖ה וְאַהֲרֹֽן׃

It was they who spoke to Pharaoh king of Egypt to free the Israelites from the Egyptians; these are the same Moshe and Aaron.

 

What does it mean these are the same Moshe and Aharon, as opposed to different ones?  Rashi explains, it means despite their rise to greatness, their high profile, prominence, even power as spokespeople of Klal Yisrael, they were unchanged as people, they remained humble and mission driven. 

 

The same can be said about Rabbi Hauer.  הוא משה, he was the same person, as Rashi says, 

בשליחותם ובצדקתם מתחלה ועד סוף, with a sense of mission from beginning to end and with righteousness.

 

Rabbi Hauer set the bar for his colleagues and friends.  We strived to be like him and now he is gone. Reflecting on our unfinished conversations, I am reminded of the Gemara (Shabbos 153a) which advises we should do teshuva one day before we die. How can anyone know that day? The answer is profound: live each day as if it could be your last, and strive to be your best. We can’t speak to everyone as if it’s our last chance, but we can ensure that the people who matter most know how much they mean to us.

 

One of Rabbi Hauer’s favorite insights, which he shared with me several times, is from the moment when Hashem visits Avraham after his bris, and three travelers appear at his doorstep. Avraham interrupts his conversation with Hashem to greet and host them. Rabbi Hauer would ask: how could he do such a thing? Wasn’t it disrespectful to Hashem? He explained that in that moment, Avraham had a choice: to continue speaking with Hashem or to act like Hashem by showing kindness. The greater tribute, Rabbi Hauer suggested, was the latter.

 

Rabbi Hauer has been taken from us. We can no longer speak to him directly, but we can strive to be more like him: genuine, compassionate, thoughtful, and concerned about Klal Yisrael. In doing so, we offer a tribute he would have considered even higher than words.

 

Rabbi Efrem Goldberg

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our newsletter or connect with us on WhatsApp.